Wine of the week: August 21, 2014 – Volume 1

Seeing as I uScreen Shot 2014-08-20 at 3.44.36 PMsed to run a moderately well read wine blog (, I have decided to make Thursday my wine/booze day.  Each Thursday I’ll tell about a wine, spirit, wine region, wine/food pairing, etc that I found interesting that week.

For this first edition I bring you the 2013 Kim Crawford Sauvignon Blanc.  I wrote about this wine before (on F&WB)- it’s a perennial favorite and the Quality to Price Ratio (QPR) is just fantastic at around $14.  It has a lot of the characteristics people like about Sauvignon blanc (crisp, dry, fresh flavors) but what I love about this wine is the acidity.  The pH meter might break if you dip it in a glass as this stuff has some zing which makes this a great wine for food, especially spicy dishes.  I would highly recommend this wine and encourage grabbing a few to keep around the house!


Posted in Wine | Leave a comment

Nanoo Nanoo, Robin.

A terrible disease took his life. I’m hopeful that in losing such a great person we may all be reminded of the impact of mental disorders, especially depression, in our society. It is time we treat mental illnesses as diseases of the body and mind, not problems of character or weakness.

His death is surreal, or at least as surreal as the death of a stranger can be. But I suppose that is why many of us are taking this hard, as if we knew him personally. He wasn’t a stranger. For the last 4 decades he’s shared his life with us and we felt in some way we shared ours with him. We saw some of us in each of his characters. Those of us who at some point wanted to be compassionate doctors or psychologists. Teachers or poets. Irreverent DJ or a flamboyant drag club owner! Or even Peter Pan.
He’ll be missed, but we’re very fortunate to have a lot good memories…and youtube, where he’ll spend eternity in digital media. Nanoo nanoo.

Carol Burnett and Robin Williams -The Funeral

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dendrite Pruning and Optical Methods in Neuroscience

Screen Shot 2014-04-03 at 11.07.57 AMAs always this is meant to be a brief overview of a paper (and the methods used in neuroscience) I happened to have found interesting- for more details please refer to the manuscript itself.

I enjoyed reading a relatively recent paper published in Science from group in Japan (Kazuo Emoto, The University of Tokyo)  that suggests a role for Ca2+ signaling in dendritic pruning, a house-cleaning function in neurons that has been shown to be very important in learning and memory, as well as experience and some forms of cognitive deficits (such as autism and neurodegeneration).

Dendrites are highly branched areas of the cell that act as antennae receive information from neighboring cell.  Pruning refers to a highly complex, regulated, activity dependent process in which connections that are non-essential to the formation of the developing brain are cleaved.

In pruning, our neurons clean house.  Unnecessary connections formed during development are trashed as a way to reduce clutter and improve accuracy and efficiency of signaling.  Many of the basic mechanisms behind how pruning works have been identified.  Specific cascades of enzymes (caspases) as well as a key self-destruction pathway (proteosome-ubiquitin) work together to rid individual neurons of unnecessary connections.  While a lot is known about the processes that regulate the pruning, very little is known about the signaling that tells which dendritic arbors (branches of dendrites) are to be pruned and which of those is to be kept as a part of the neural network.

Continue reading

Posted in Andor Technology, Genetics, Neuroscience | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What is the current technical limitation in your scientific field?

Lavoisier conducting an experiment related combustion generated by amplified sun light.As a neuroscientist working for a technology company I spend a lot of time seeing new applications. These can range from new imaging probes, to new optogenetics tools or transgenic animals, all the way to new camera sensor technologies or super resolution algorithms. I spend a lot of time in labs seeing some really cool research, long before it’s published or presented at a conference. This is an aspect of my job I really love- getting to see where the fields of advanced imaging, electrophysiology, optophysiology, optogenetics, and neuroscience are headed.

The researchers we work with are constantly pushing the barriers of the latest and greatest in technology to better address increasingly complex questions in biology (side note: we also work with astronomers, physical science and chemistry, but I’m heavily focused on biological applications).

My question to my research friends and readers is simply this: what is the current technical limitation(s) in your field and if you could have one single new tool (either a new technology, new probe, new animal model, behavioral test, etc) what would you want?

I’m hoping to get a range of responses to open this up for a bigger question in how can we (academia and industry) work together to form open partnerships that are focused on advancing science. A lot of research money is wasted on overpriced, outdated, and often times the wrong technology for the research question at hand (I blame the sales rep as well as the researcher who doesn’t spend the time to educate her/himself) and an open discussion on how to save researchers time and (all of us taxpayers) money is long overdue.

Posted in Politics of Science, Science Discussions, Science Techniques | 2 Comments

SDL Book Club: April 2014: Mirroring People – Marco Iacoboni

Screen Shot 2014-04-04 at 7.28.31 PMApril 2014:  Mirroring People: The New Science of How We Connect with Others – Marco Iacoboni

Please have this book ready by April 30, 2014!

What accounts for the remarkable ability to get inside another person’s head—to know what they’re thinking and feeling? “Mind reading” is the very heart of what it means to be human, creating a bridge between self and others that is fundamental to the development of culture and society. But until recently, scientists didn’t understand what in the brain makes it possible.

This has all changed in the last decade. Marco Iacoboni, a leading neuroscientist whose work has been covered in The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and The Wall Street Journal, explains the groundbreaking research into mirror neurons, the “smart cells” in our brain that allow us to understand others. From imitation to morality, from learning to addiction, from political affiliations to consumer choices, mirror neurons seem to have properties that are relevant to all these aspects of social cognition. As The New York Times reports: “The discovery is shaking up numerous scientific disciplines, shifting the understanding of culture, empathy, philosophy, language, imitation, autism and psychotherapy.”
Mirroring People is the first book for the general reader on this revolutionary new science.
Posted in Book Club, Neuroscience | Leave a comment

Brief review: Simultaneous two-color optogenetics using novel probes (Klapoetke et al., 2014)


Cartoon structure of rhodopsin – Wikipedia Commons

To catch up on the field of optogenetics, here is a primer and here is an update on some new stuff.  Also refer to the literature (Mattis et al., 2011; Fenno et al., 2011).  This post assumes a working understanding of Optogenetics, Electrophysiology and some genetics.

A recent paper out of MIT (Ed Boyden lab) identifies two new probes in the ever growing quest to find improve optogenetic tools that will allow for greater spectral separation of activation/excitation wavelengths.  Some of the major challenges for optogenetics research are:

  • genetically expressing opsins, or other light sensitive molecules in model organisms/specific cells
  • finding the right probe that addresses a specific need (i.e. high frequency stimulation, or activate a specific Gi/o pathway)
  • delivering light of a specific wavelength to a particular target in tissue and/or specific cell types
  • spectrally separating a single probe (i.e. ChR2 activated at 470nm) from an imaging probe (i.e. GCamp3, or even the new RCamp which can be activated by blue light)
  • finding two or more probes to express that will not “cross-talk”- such that excitation wavelength of probe 1 will not activate probe 2

Optogenetics allows for very precise control of cell excitability and/or signaling pathways and researchers continue to push the limit of the existing tools and pharmacological agents.  For instance, if studying the interaction of interneurons in the hippocampus area CA1 it would be beneficial to be able to simultaneously activate CCK interneurons while optically inhibiting PV interneurons, or vice versa.  There are currently methods of blocking one versus the other (machR agonist carbachol for instance activates CCK only) but to rapidly be able to control the activity of these neurons would be of great interest in studying the details of synaptic transmission of individual or small groups of neurons (worth noting is these types of on/off, two wavelength probes exist for other applications such as PIF-2.

Continue reading

Posted in Genetics, Neuroscience, Optogenetics, Quick Review | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Targeting Light: Two recent papers that use active illumination!

Screen Shot 2014-03-20 at 5.02.10 PMIn my day job I get to travel quite a bit and visit labs around the world who use methods in microscopy in imaging.  These labs range from neuroscience to developmental biology and everything in between, and many of these labs have very specific needs when it comes to light delivery.  The applications I most often work with can involve from high power lasers for ablation and thrombosis, or FRAP or photoconversion.  I’m very focused on optogenetics and uncaging, as well as any type of imaging, especially the use of genetically encoded indicators (for voltage, ions, temperature, pH, etc).  

While many people tend to use a simple configuration for single spot/point illumination, or full field illumination (and we provide these tools as well) where we are unique is in systems that allow for “targeted” or “active illumination.”  There are many methods for targeting light (possibly a good topic for an upcoming review) but the two of the main methods used are either using a galvo-mirror system (very fast mirrors that move a single spot of light in X-Y to create regions with the ability to target to a diffraction limited spot) or a digital micromirror device, or DMD.  

Continue reading

Posted in Andor Technology, Neuroscience, Optogenetics, Quick Review | 1 Comment

SDL Book Club March 2014: Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality

Screen Shot 2014-03-01 at 2.22.35 PM

March 2014Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality – By Patricia Churchland

Please have this read by March 24, 2014 for a discussion within a week of that date.

From Wikipedia:  “Particia Churchland is a is a Canadian-American philosopher noted for her contributions to neurophilosophy and the philosophy of mind. She is UC President’s Professor of Philosophy Emerita at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), where she has taught since 1984. She has also held an adjunct professorship at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies since 1989. Educated at the University of British Columbia, the University of Pittsburgh, and the University of Oxford, she taught philosophy at the University of Manitoba from 1969 to 1984 and is married to the philosopher Paul Churchland.”

Patricia Churchland previously wrote a book called Neurophilosophy in which she lays the foundation for the study of philosophy based on basic neuroscience and does a nice job giving an overview of neuropsychology and develops a template for studying philosophy from a basic resaerch persepctive.  In Braintrust, Churchland attempts to describe what we know about morality and moral behavior through social sciences and the underlying neural mechanisms (mostly from preclinical/animal research).  This should be a fun read for us all and I look forward to discussing it with you all next month!

Posted in Book Club, Neuroscience | Leave a comment

Optogenetics / Optophysiology References Page on SDL!

Dear friends,

I am compiling optogenetics, optophysiology and advanced imaging references and will be organizing them by category/field.  I have launched the page and over the next week it will grow to contain all papers I can find in a given field.  Where possible I will post links to the articles for download and in some cases will post comments and footnotes on the research.

Science Publications / Reference Page

I will also have a page with references of the “Latest and Greatest” papers that I find interesting.  This will focus on “Advanced Online” publications and things that are hot off the press!

I’m very excited for this endeavor and am open to ideas and suggestions on how to improve the format and organizing.

I’m very behind on about 5-6 paper reviews I began writing, expect a lot of activity in the coming weeks!



Posted in Neuroscience, Optogenetics, Published Manuscript Review | Tagged | Leave a comment

Science Driven Life (SDL) book club to begin February 2014

Dear friends,

Just a one time notice that we’ll be starting a SDL book club in February 2014.  Details can be found here:

February 2014:   A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather than Nothing – Dr. Lawrence Krauss

If you’re interested in participating please comment or send me an email: michael dot mohammadi at gmail dot com!


Posted in Book Club, Books, Physics | Leave a comment